MetaMask vs. Trust Wallet: Which Is Best In 2025?

MetaMask and Trust Wallet are two of the most popular non-custodial crypto wallets, but which is right for you? Compare in our MetaMask vs. Trust Wallet guide.

MetaMask vs. Trust Wallet: At a glance


Feature	MetaMask	Trust Wallet
Supported blockchains	Primarily Ethereum, but supports Binance Smart Chain (BSC), Polygon, and other EVM-compatible networks	Supports multiple blockchains, including Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain, Solana, and more
Platforms	Browser extension, mobile app (iOS & Android)	Brower extension, mobile app (iOS & Android)
Native token swaps	Yes, via built-in swap feature	Yes, via built-in swap feature
NFT support	Yes, but primarily Ethereum-based NFTs	Yes, supports NFTs from multiple blockchains
DApp integration	Strong support via browser extension and mobile app browser	Built-in DApp browser on mobile
Staking	Supports staking for ETH	Supports staking for multiple assets
Security	Open-source, user-controlled keys	Open-source, user-controlled keys
Ease of use	User-friendly, but more technical for multi-chain use	Beginner-friendly with simple multi-chain support
Fees	Network fees apply; additional swap fees	Network fees apply; additional swap fees

Let’s take a look at the key features in more depth.

MetaMask vs. Trust Wallet: Supported blockchains

MetaMask started as an Ethereum-only wallet but has expanded to support Binance Smart Chain (BSC), Polygon, and other Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)-compatible networks. However, adding these networks requires some manual configuration.

Trust Wallet supports a wider range of blockchains out of the box, including Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain, Solana, and other Layer-1 networks. If you plan to use a variety of networks without manual setup, Trust Wallet might be the better option for you.

Trust Wallet vs. MetaMask: Platforms and accessibility

MetaMask offers both a browser extension (for Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and Brave) and a mobile app. The browser extension makes it a strong choice for interacting with decentralized applications (DApps) on desktops.

Trust Wallet also offers a browser extension for the main web browsers, as well as a mobile app with strong DApp browser features. If you prefer mobile access, Trust Wallet may have a slight edge here with marginally more mobile features.

Trust Wallet vs. MetaMask: Native token swaps

Both wallets offer built-in token swap functionality. MetaMask integrates swaps directly within the app but primarily supports Ethereum-based tokens. Trust Wallet also provides token swaps for multiple networks, including BSC, making it slightly more versatile in this regard.

MetaMask vs. Trust Wallet: NFT support

MetaMask and Trust Wallet both support NFTs, but their usability differs. MetaMask is mainly optimized for Ethereum-based NFTs and doesn’t have the best UI for managing collectibles on other networks.

Trust Wallet provides a smoother NFT management experience, supporting multiple blockchains beyond Ethereum. If you plan on collecting NFTs across different networks, Trust Wallet may be the more convenient choice.

MetaMask vs. Trust Wallet: DApp integration

MetaMask is the go-to choice for interacting with Web3 applications on desktop because of its browser extension. It also offers a mobile browser for DApps, but the desktop experience remains superior.

Trust Wallet offers a similar experience offering both a built-in DApp feature for mobile and a browser extension for desktop.

MetaMask vs. Trust Wallet: Staking and passive income

One of Trust Wallet’s biggest advantages is its built-in staking support for multiple cryptocurrencies, including Binance Coin (BNB), Tezos (XTZ), and others. This allows users to earn passive income directly within the app.

MetaMask does offer native staking features, but primarily for Ethereum, including pooled, liquid, and validator staking in-app.

Trust Wallet vs. MetaMask: Security

Both MetaMask and Trust Wallet are non-custodial, meaning users retain full control over their private keys. Both wallets are also open-source, making their code available for community audits.

From a security perspective, both wallets have the same risks which largely come down to user risk. Both are susceptible to phishing attacks, but this comes down to user error so remember to follow best security practices to protect your assets.

Trust Wallet vs. MetaMask: Ease of use

MetaMask has a user-friendly design but requires more manual setup when adding non-Ethereum networks. This can be slightly intimidating for beginners, but there are plenty of guides available online to help.

Trust Wallet simplifies multi-chain interactions, making it a better choice for users who want a hassle-free experience without configuring networks manually.

MetaMask vs. Trust Wallet: Fees

Both wallets charge network fees, which vary depending on blockchain congestion. Additionally, both charge small swap fees when using their built-in exchange features. Neither wallet has a significant cost advantage over the other.

So, which is best?

Choose MetaMask if: You interact frequently with DApps on desktop, primarily use Ethereum and EVM-compatible networks, or need a browser extension for Web3 access.
Choose Trust Wallet if: You prefer mobile-first convenience, want built-in support for multiple blockchains and staking, or need a better NFT management experience.

Both wallets are excellent choices, and the best one for you depends on how you plan to use it. If you’re deep into Ethereum DeFi and need desktop DApp access, MetaMask is a strong pick. If you want an easy-to-use, mobile wallet with native staking and NFT support for multiple chains, Trust Wallet is the way to go.

Don’t forget the tax bill…

Whatever wallet you use, if you’re trading, selling, or staking crypto with MetaMask or Trust Wallet - you’ll have a tax bill. Koinly can help. Just use your public address(es) to import your transaction data from MetaMask or Trust Wallet to Koinly automatically and it’ll calculate your tax liability. Best of all, it’s completely free to try.